Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal

[Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>]

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
> I can't imagine how that passage translates to "the relative URIs can
> mean whatever the particular application wants them to mean."  I read
> that as leaving room for xml:base or a processing instruction which has
> similar effect, though I suppose you could be really really really
> liberal in your interpretation and get to "whatever the particular
> application wants them to mean."

What I wrote was a bit extreme!  The lengths we'll go to to make a point!
The point I wanted to make is that the spec opens the door for other
interpretations.  I'm certainly not advocating any interpretation other than
the normal case in XML 1.0, but I am keen for the information to be made
available for others to access when required.

Regards
Rob

---
Rob Lugt
ElCel Technology
http://www.elcel.com/