[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
- From: Rob Lugt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:07:07 +0100
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> I can't imagine how that passage translates to "the relative URIs can
> mean whatever the particular application wants them to mean." I read
> that as leaving room for xml:base or a processing instruction which has
> similar effect, though I suppose you could be really really really
> liberal in your interpretation and get to "whatever the particular
> application wants them to mean."
What I wrote was a bit extreme! The lengths we'll go to to make a point!
The point I wanted to make is that the spec opens the door for other
interpretations. I'm certainly not advocating any interpretation other than
the normal case in XML 1.0, but I am keen for the information to be made
available for others to access when required.