[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Blueberry
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Peter Jacobi <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:45:30 -0400
Peter Jacobi wrote:
> I assume it amounts to one additional numeric code per Unicode
> character, which even can get into the next revision of the
> main Unicode Character Database itself.
Not even that, just a few rules for deducing name and name-start
status from the existing fields, plus a very small backward
compatibility table for Unicode 2.0 cruft.
In fact, the UCD itself is not be extended any more; instead,
Unicode creates subsidiary tables such as Asian Width.
There is / one art || John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein