[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
- From: Rod Davison <rdavison@sprint.ca>
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, Steve Rowe <sarowe@textwise.com>,xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:52:55 -0400
I think this has to be the last word on the subject. Enemata!?!
This is becomming a tad surreal. Let's just each make up our own plural and
be done with it. I think I'm going to use schemaux. Then if I write more
than one schema that doesn't follow the spec, I'll have faux schemaux.
On Friday 29 June 2001 02:48 pm, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Steve Rowe wrote:
> > Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> > 23. enema/enemata
--
====================================================
Rod Davison @ Critical Knowledge Systems Inc
rdavison@sprint.ca
====================================================
This message has been brought to you by the language C and the number F.
====================================================