[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DOM 2 and .NET
- From: Julian Reschke <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Joshua Allen <email@example.com>, Manos Batsis <firstname.lastname@example.org>,email@example.com, XML-INTEREST@JAVA.SUN.COM
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:15:31 +0200
> From: Joshua Allen [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:32 AM
> To: Manos Batsis; email@example.com; XML-INTEREST@JAVA.SUN.COM
> Subject: RE: DOM 2 and .NET
> > > In the case of the "extra" stuff, pretty much every DOM
> > > adds some extra stuff to cover things not covered in the spec, such
> > > loading, saving, XPath, etc. These particular three have
> > > been in MSXML
> > (which after all, are proprietary) focused on implementing better
> > implementations of the actual DOM specs.
> Do you mean more complete implementations? Your frustrations with
> coding to different DOM specs and having to maintain three different
> bodies of code are something I can sympathize with -- for W3C/DHTML DOM.
> In my experience, though, the major popular XML DOM implementations are
> pretty much 100% complete. I haven't experienced any of the major XML
How about conformant DOM level 2 support in MSXML3/4? createElementNS and
related methods are missing, creating a lot of confusion everywhere...