[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCHEmata (was: ambo, duo, etc.)
- From: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>
- To: XML DEV <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 21:40:22 +0800
From: "John Cowan" <email@example.com>
> Also, it is clear that "schemas" is stressed on the first syllable,
> many (including me, until today) fall into error by stressing "schemata"
> on the second syllable rather than the correct first (all methods of
> pronouncing Greek words agree on this point).
If it is being pronounced as a foreign word. If it is being pronounced as
an English word then it is only natural to shift the emphasis to the second
syllable: that syllabic shift is not so common in USA I believe. (If you
seen Kenneth Clark's TV series Civilization, you will hear that he
"capitalism" with an emphasis on the second syllable: an emphatic syllabic
shift. Maybe it is Scotch.)
If we must pronounce schemata with non-English rhythm, all the more reason
to skip to "schemas". Where will it end? Are we to brand as ignorant anyone
who pronounces the "n" in typhoon or uses a plural "typhoons"?