[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Data storage, data exchange, data manipulation
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 01:19:01 -0400
Uh, oh, this is starting to sound a lot like ASN.1!
> I think it was Tom Passin who pointed out the distinction between
> and physical data models. This would imply conceptual as well as physical
> schemas, although I think all schemas to date are schemas that model a
> domain with some physical representation in mind. Can there be a
> Schema? UML may get us close to defining one, but even there I think UML
> tainted by physical model pollution in subtle ways.
> So a conceptual schema independent of physical representation is
> to my mind. That representaion would then be transformed to various
> schemas, although probably not isomorphically.
> Now, the rules for defining a conceptual schema based on business domain I
> think could be formalized, just like database schemas normalization rules
> are formalized. I think a conceptual schema would model a physical reality
> in the same way that mathematics models a physical reality (plus some
> surreality for good measure).