[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DTD Notation
- From: Peter Flynn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:16:44 +0100
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Rod Davison wrote:
> <!ELEMENT Test2 (ItemA, ItemB?, (ItemC)*)>
> In this particular example, as far as I am aware, these paras around itemC
> are redundant although I have heard rumours that withou the para, some
> parsers get... shall we say, confused. Anyone else have some real experience
> instead of my speculation?
Yes, they're redundant. Any parser that trips on their absence
is broken and should not be used.