[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Ann Navarro <email@example.com>, John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:11:45 -0500
Since the W3C is talking up an architecture group,
and because XML is a fundamental of the architecture,
I would think before major release changes are
proposed, that group would form and work on its
recommendations to be added to others.
<notaBene>I'm not in favor of closed groups that
go off and plan the future in secret. Never have
been, but the W3C is the owner
of XML, does as it thinks, and in the case of a
major release version, that group would be a
consideration. Given the effect on other
parts of the web architecture, it would be
prudent to get that in motion if it is an
inevitability before serious consideration
or heated debates over a major features
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:email@example.com]
That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you will
(and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more ideas
that WE think are required of a new version as well".
Experience and difficulty with the current Rec are not a closed event unto
those in the WG.
Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few
problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to do
so yet again.