[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Ann Navarro <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:17:40 -0400
Ann Navarro wrote:
> That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you
> will (and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more
> ideas that WE think are required of a new version as well".
Doubtless. But note the last requirement in the draft.
> Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few
> problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to
> do so yet again.
That is, as far as I am concerned, the whole idea.
There is / one art || John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein