[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>,Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:53:17 -0400
At 01:16 PM 7/19/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>How not? After all, there is no actual draft Blueberry spec yet.
>We are at the very *beginning* of the process. There will be
>at least one more draft of the requirements;
While others have addressed any "proposal" or substantive issues in these
areas, there have been times where the discussion has given me pause with
comments of the sort "we don't intend to..." or "that would be too big...",
etc.
If the group is truly in the requirements gathering phase, it would follow
that all requirements be gathered and reviewed, without any gate-keeping
function that is making subjective judgements on whether something is or is
not appropriate, except for exceptionally extreme cases.
Ann
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
http://www.webgeek.com/books/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/