[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>,Elliotte Rusty Harold <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:35:56 -0500
To be sure this is clear, the intent is for a change
that includes only the Blueberry requirements and
would not open up a major version (eg, 1.1) change?
So the notion that other fixes could be included
(eg, tighter coupling to the namespace requirement)
would not be part of this effort? Yes to both of
those questions with some assurance that this will
not change opportunistically would add to the comfort
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: John Cowan [mailto:email@example.com]
> (This could perhaps be partially averted by naming Blueberry, XML
That was indeed my original name: the connotation of "1.0.1" is
"a very small change" which is indeed the idea.