[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:16:26 -0400
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> To be sure this is clear, the intent is for a change
> that includes only the Blueberry requirements and
> would not open up a major version (eg, 1.1) change?
> So the notion that other fixes could be included
> (eg, tighter coupling to the namespace requirement)
> would not be part of this effort?
> Yes to both of
> those questions with some assurance that this will
> not change opportunistically would add to the comfort
That is the whole point of the final Blueberry requirement.
There is / one art || John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein