[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Ann Navarro <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:27:38 -0400
At 03:20 PM 7/19/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>What's going on here is not "What should go into the next version of
>XML?" but rather "We have some ideas that (we think) require a new
>version, unfortunately: here they are."
That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you will
(and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more ideas
that WE think are required of a new version as well".
Experience and difficulty with the current Rec are not a closed event unto
those in the WG.
Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few
problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to do
so yet again.
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/