[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:17:37 -0400
At 9:18 AM +0900 7/20/01, Murata Makoto wrote:
>>They're less than twenty of these. Such a list is not at all hard to construct. To be specific:
>
>It is very hard to construct. See the list of charsets of IETF and RFC 2278.
>Although peole have worked hard, the result is far from being satisfactory.
>
>ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets
>
But very few of these contain Blueberry characters. The idea is to specifically exclude all the character sets that can't possibly be Blueberry. And as I said elsewhere, it really doesn't matter all that much if we miss some, as long as we have Unicode.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+