[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Richard Tobin <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:41:47 -0500
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Subject: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
>>What "intellectual property" (a prejudicial term if ever I heard one)
>>is there in SGML except the copyright in the text of the standard?
>publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition
Well, you've got me there. I have no idea what any of those have to
do with SGML.
Next you'll be claiming that running NSGMLS constitutes an
unauthorized public performance of SGML.