[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Richard Tobin <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:42:51 -0500
One avenue would be a misappropriation remedy for unfair competition flowing
from the seminal authority of International News Service v. Associated Press
decided in 1918 by the United States Supreme Court
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Subject: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
>>What "intellectual property" (a prejudicial term if ever I heard one)
>>is there in SGML except the copyright in the text of the standard?
>publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition
Well, you've got me there. I have no idea what any of those have to
do with SGML.
Next you'll be claiming that running NSGMLS constitutes an
unauthorized public performance of SGML.