[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
- From: "Al B. Snell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:43:28 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote:
> > True textual formats never use length codes,
> Ahem. Does the term "Hollerith string" mean anything to you?
> If not, consider the "Content-Length" header in HTTP POSTs.
Hmmm... I'd forgetten about those. Is it still a "text format" if it can't
be simply edited in Notepad (which would have to involve manually
recalculating the Content-Legnth)? :-)
> IMHO the true distinction between textual and binary formats
> is that binary formats are represented by octets, whereas
> textual formats are represented by characters, which are in
> turn represented by octets.
> SVG is a textual format, but GIF is a binary format, by these
Yes. "textual" is a particular subset of "binary". It's no longer really
about a subset of the 0..255 range either if UTF-8 and so on come into
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software