[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)

From: Al Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:52:18 +0100 (BST)

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote:

> Then there is the Other School, which holds that XML is independent
> IP-wise of SGML.

It'd certainly get busted on a "look and feel" case :-)

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software

References:
- Re: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Request: Techniques for reducing the size of XML instances
Next by Date: RE: XML tutorial comments
Previous by thread: Re: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
Next by thread: RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread