[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 12:33:41 -0500
As Todd pointed out, this appears to be an undecided
issue. But again, we are wrangling over words that
have by dint of community norms, become increasingly
obscure. As far as I am concerned, what is legal
is not necessarily right regardless of the payoff
but that is certainly only one opinion.
So get patents like fire extinguishers: until your
house is on fire, they are ugly wall ornaments.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: John Cowan [mailto:email@example.com]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:
> If the subject here is still "protection", there isn't much protection
> against IP being reused, and changed.
If there is no protection, it is not IP = intellectual property.
"No right without a remedy." Short of patent protection, ideas/concepts
are not IP.