[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Another "Against the Grain" column on XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:27:43 -0500
Not odd but true, now that we have these giant
relational databases with QBE, forms etc., we
find we have to put browser technology in it
and use a document model for a more intuitive
interface because forms are great for data
entry but lousy for navigation and presentation.
Somewhere in all that is the pony.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@pacbell.net]
Note the assumption there: XML being used for highly regular
information models. Yet I thought the real strength of XML was
in situations where such regular models were atypical ... yes, folk
from database-intensive worlds say there are few such situations,
but that doesn't match my observation.
Folk used to using an RDBMS as their hammer may view the
world as a set of nail relations, post-normalization. I think it's
got a lot more richness than that, actually ... :)