[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Application Design
- From: Don Park <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 22:13:28 -0700
> <Don Park>
> > I think that the problem with XSLT is that XSLT
> > is often misleading, pretending to be more
> > 'powerful' and 'portable' than it actually is.
> </Don Park>
Above was Paul's comment, not mine.
I agree with everyone that XSLT is the right tool for manipulating XML. What I disagree with is the notion that 'if you build it, they will come'. For majority of people out there, learning of XSLT or even XML is a sizable investment of their time and resources withdrawn from their daily lives. I perceive that most people consider XML to be worth making an investment in, but not XSLT unless something drastic happens.
If I am right, XML consultants would be doing a disservice to our clients if we pushed XSLT-based solutions. I have not qualified my statement with 'unless they have in-house XSLT expertise' because, if they had XSLT expertise in-house, they are not likely to need XML consultants in the first place.
Sad but I see what I see.