[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces Defined
- From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@Kadius.Com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>,xml-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:32:06 +0100
Nice similes. Another cause is the fact that namespaces were created
after the XML 1.0 Rec. This forcibly lead to a solution that was more
contentious and less clean than a hypothetical "there from day one"
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM
>A common problem of "less is more" in specs is
>that active imaginations fill in the
>details just like an off-camera romantic interlude in a
>G-rated movie or a slasher scene in a horror
>flick. The results depend on the
>events leading up to that unstated assumption.