[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces Defined
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "Brothers, Michael (IA)" <Michael.Brothers@ia.ngb.army.mil>,'Leigh Dodds' <firstname.lastname@example.org>, xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:13:39 -0500
A common problem of "less is more" in specs is
that active imaginations fill in the
details just like an off-camera romantic interlude in a
G-rated movie or a slasher scene in a horror
flick. The results depend on the
events leading up to that unstated assumption.
We can't blame the web. This is true in
any medium. The problem is actually the
use of URLs for namespace disambiguation.
It works but it wonks as as well.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Brothers, Michael (IA) [mailto:Michael.Brothers@ia.ngb.army.mil]
I agree with the irony, but the real irony is that anyone might be surprised
that this is a prevailing view of namespaces outside the development