[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, Al Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>,Brendan Macmillan <bren@mail.csse.monash.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:44:17 -0700
Without going into details of the discussion, I would just as a reminder
like to point out that SOAP doesn't aspire to be a distributed object
system. It is a nothing more than a wire protocol.
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
>Wrong; that's one mechanism within the architecture. Normally
>implemented using IIOP, but potentially also using some sort
>of SOAP profile. Brendan had it right, except that managing
>state is an application's responsibility (though one can argue
>about shared responsibilities during object activation).