Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.

[Peter Piatko <piatko@research.telcordia.com>]

I find it amusing that we are having discussion about what labels to use in
our discussion about labels.  :-)  I used the word "meaning" because my
coffee carafe broke this morning and in my caffeine-withdrawl induced stupor
I couldn't think of a better word.  :-)

Thanks,

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
To: "Peter Piatko" <piatko@research.telcordia.com>; "Ronald Bourret"
<rpbourret@rpbourret.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.


> Peter Piatko wrote:
> > So far on this list I've seen 2, well 2.5, interpretations:
> >
> > (1) A ulabel should have a 1-1 mapping to its "meaning" (a word I am
being
> > intentionally vague about).
>
> Please let's not use the word "meaning". It's obviously only a part of the
> meaning. A content model is what a DTD maps a name to. Is the term
"content
> model" broad enough to cover all of the cases we're talking about?
>
> Evan Lenz
> XYZFind Corp.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>