Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.

[David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>]

In some cases "role" can be appropriately neutral.
Roles can be contextual, but don't need to be.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Piatko" <piatko@research.telcordia.com>
To: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>; "Ronald Bourret" <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>;
<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.


> I find it amusing that we are having discussion about what labels to use in
> our discussion about labels.  :-)  I used the word "meaning" because my
> coffee carafe broke this morning and in my caffeine-withdrawl induced stupor
> I couldn't think of a better word.  :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
> To: "Peter Piatko" <piatko@research.telcordia.com>; "Ronald Bourret"
> <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:11 PM
> Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
>
>
> > Peter Piatko wrote:
> > > So far on this list I've seen 2, well 2.5, interpretations:
> > >
> > > (1) A ulabel should have a 1-1 mapping to its "meaning" (a word I am
> being
> > > intentionally vague about).
> >
> > Please let's not use the word "meaning". It's obviously only a part of the
> > meaning. A content model is what a DTD maps a name to. Is the term
> "content
> > model" broad enough to cover all of the cases we're talking about?
> >
> > Evan Lenz
> > XYZFind Corp.