[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:08:55 -0500
Agree but that isn't the way it was presented.
I almost wrote "each table is treated like a
subdoc" but realized that most people don't get
Still, what one gets is tablename.columnname
and the trouble starts when the mysterious and
very overloaded uRthing has a findItSomewhere
but don't dereference this to get it semantic.
So I'm still left wondering which of the
notSoSimpleItTurnsOut things we Dare To Do Less of.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:email@example.com]
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> You said it most succinctly here:
> David Hunter: "There is no problem, from the database, telling which
> is which, because
> each is in it's own table."
> Isn't that the same as saying a table is an element?
No, it is saying that each table is a namespace.