RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word

[Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>]

I knew if I read down this thread far enough Len would 
mention groves! And if he didn't I was going to...

It seems like if you generalise Michael's notions of 
attaching generic annotations to the results of a 
parse you have a grove. And picking out the parts 
relevant to a particular application (or class of 
application) is a grove plan.

I know there is a lot of baggage attached to that 
particular term, but I've seen suggestion of a similar 
mechanism appear time and again. Even in Simpleton circles.

Cheers,

L.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
> Sent: 28 August 2001 22:04
> To: Ronald Bourret; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
> 
> 
> Sounds again suspiciously like grove plans.
> 
> Len 
> http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
> 
> Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
> Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@rpbourret.com]
> 
> Michael Brennan wrote:
> > It is very typical for an XML application to want to associate certain
> > metadata with XML information items to suit certain processing 
> needs. One
> > can easily envision different metadata vocabularies to suit different
> > domains.
> 
> Very nicely put.
> 
> And when you look at it this way, it's pretty clear that the the PSVI is
> a mixture of several different sets of metadata. For example, what
> complexType an element is supposed to be is different from whether it
> can be validated by (converted to) that complexType.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>