[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:04:08 -0500
Sounds again suspiciously like grove plans.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@rpbourret.com]
Michael Brennan wrote:
> It is very typical for an XML application to want to associate certain
> metadata with XML information items to suit certain processing needs. One
> can easily envision different metadata vocabularies to suit different
> domains.
Very nicely put.
And when you look at it this way, it's pretty clear that the the PSVI is
a mixture of several different sets of metadata. For example, what
complexType an element is supposed to be is different from whether it
can be validated by (converted to) that complexType.