[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:48:20 -0500
That's a fact. Only systems are "meaningful".
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Tim Bray [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
At 08:20 AM 28/08/01 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>The more I see new terms such as "ulabel" and oddities
>such as "t*pe* to explain what markup is about given
>that the problem is actually no one quite knows what
>namespaces are about, I have to wonder. Obscurity is
>hard to hide.
Markup isn't *about* anything. Namespaces aren't
*about* anything. They are labels. They provide part
of the infrastructure you need to build edifices of
schemaware and displayware and ebizware and so on.