[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Explicit Factoring (was RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word)
- From: Leigh Dodds <email@example.com>
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Ronald Bourret <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:30:20 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: 30 August 2001 12:44
> To: Ronald Bourret
> Cc: 'email@example.com'
> Subject: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
> What factoring of the PSVI would you like that isn't already there
> implicitly? [...]
What about making it explicit?
Seriously, this seems to be what most are asking for. This would
be useful for the same reason shaving XPath and XSLT from the
XSL spec was useful.
If the spec is already well factored, then this shouldn't involve
more than pulling out the relevant piece(s) into separate
specifications. And if it isn't that easy then maybe there's too
many 'implicit' details. So it would be a useful exercise in
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham