[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Help
- From: Purvesh <purvesh@whizlabs.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 19:07:48 -0700
Can somebody give me exact links for specifications of the following:
XML
XSL
CSS
DTD
Schema
SAX
DOM
Thanks in advance..
Purvesh
----- Original Message -----
From: <Tony.Coates@reuters.com>
To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:39 AM
Subject: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices ? Versioning
>
> On 05/09/2001 19:56:47 Michael Brennan wrote:
>
> >I don't think 3 and 4 are reliable. #3 makes the incorrect assumption
that
> >"instance documents give the name and location of the associated schema".
This
> >is undoubtedly the prevalent case, but as sound entity resolution
mechanisms
> >gain more widespread use, I'm inclined to believe there will be less and
less
> >of this. You cannot assume a consuming application is relying upon the
> >"schemaLocation" attribute (or even paying any attention to it). I think
> >changing the target namespace is the only reliable approach.
>
> Once again, too much emphasis on the belief that everything should work
even if there is no "schemaLocation" given. I really believe that taking
this view, which does not seem to be the view of the W3C people I've talked
to, will just lead to more complication than is necessary.
>
> >In spite of the complications it poses, I think #2 is the best practice.
> >True, instance documents and schemas that include the relevant schema
must
> >change to reference the new version, but that is often a good thing. You
don't
> >want those references to indiscriminately change to reference a new
schema
> >without assurance that there are no incompatibility issues. Indeed, by
> >changing the namespace, you can permit concurrent use of different
versions of
> >a schema, allowing users time to migrate to the new version as
compatibility
> >is assured.
>
> The same is true if you insist on a versioned "schemaLocation".
>
> Cheers,
> Tony.
> ========
> Anthony B. Coates
> (1) Content Distribution Architect - Project Gazelle
> (2) Leader of XML Architecture & Design - Chief Technology Office
> Reuters Plc, London.
> Tony.Coates@reuters.com
> ========
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help
- From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
- Re: Help
- From: Jiri Jirat <Jiri.Jirat@idoox.com>