[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Debating "civil disobedience" against overly complicatedspecs
- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:16:17 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Debating "civil disobedience" against overly
complicated specs
> At 08:43 PM 9/24/2001 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
<SNIP>Interesting discourse on generic parsers</SNIP>
> On the other hand, may it would make some people happy to declare SOAP an
> SGML Protocol, and then that annoying "Simple" on the front of it could
> mean "SGML".
Actually, as of the 1.2 WD, SOAP has had its acronym status revoked! The
four letters no longer stand for anything...
Regards
Martin