Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups

[Jeff Greif <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>]

I think that Len meant that being around 4 years was insufficient
justification in itself for starting work on XML 2.0; rather, a list of
putative mistakes, dubious decisions, omissions and potential enhancements
would drive people to initiate action.  Of course, you probably didn't mean
that being around 4 years was a good reason in itself either.

Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Lyon" <david@globaltradedesk.com>
To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups


>
> Claude,
>
> I disagree with your statement about difficulty. There are many parts of
> xml 1.0 that are particularly difficult and innefficient. One only has to
> look to the questions posted on this list to see that.
>