[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Wayne Steele <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:07:15 -0500
It isn't the first time I've faced this problem
in my career. Last time, I was for all RF-only
Only accept them in the most compelling cases
and only with the consensus of the membership.
From: Wayne Steele [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
When I first started following this thread, I thought Len was being naive
about software patents, or just looking for a good argument.
But I've come to think he's actually right about this: "RF Only" is perhaps
too inflexible for the real world. "RAND" is (at least around these parts)