I would welcome this as a compromise, since I currently have to look
through text anyway to entitize other data.
Best regards
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto [mailto:murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 16:03 PM
> To: Michael Rys
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft
>
> From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:14:59 -0800
>
> > The normalization of CR, LF and CRLF can be avoided by using
their
> > character entities. So I still can preserve fidelity.
>
> You are right.
>
> How do you feel about allowing character references to C0
> control functions rather than using them directly? I was
once
> told that such changes are harmful, since bidirectional conversion
> between characters and character references is useful for I18N.
> However, since #&xD; cannot be safely converted to
carriage-return,
> such bidirectional conversion is already impossible.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Makoto
