Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 10:41 am, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> No, that misses point completely. The point is not whether XML *can*
> be as opaque as anything else. It whether XML *is* as opaque as
> anything else.
I think you are confusing XML with XMl data and XML practise.
You are correct that in many applications, tag names/attributes add
value to the data. That has nothing to do with XML *itself*... just
the way people use it.