[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Well, there is a DTD for RDDL and WAP 2.0, which are XHTML application
mixing different namespaces. You can validate a RDDL document or a WAP 2.0
document, so the semantics are well defined. Yet, RDDL won't help me to find
the DTD, because it is based on the namespace URLs. Time to use the good old
DOCTYPE...
Regards,
Nicolas
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Al B. Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com]
>Envoye : vendredi 18 janvier 2002 17:23
>A : Nicolas LEHUEN
>Cc : The Deviants
>Objet : RE: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
>
>
>On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
>
>> The problem is : in what RDDL document must I look for the
>proper schema to
>> validate the whole document ?
>
>Ahah!
>
>There is no schema to validate the whole document.
>
>Full stop.
>
>Whether or not this is an omission in the XML model of having lots of
>intermingled documents, I don't know - the semantics of this
>intermingling
>are a bit undefined, as far as I can tell.
>
>But I don't think there's anything wrong with RDDL :-)
>
>ABS
>
>--
> Alaric B. Snell
> http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/
http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
|
