Lists Home |
Date Index |
Jeff Lowery wrote:
> Should URI's be extended to include intent? I realize this opens its own
> of worms, but I'm see worms already... maybe this can is more tractable.
> least an URI that is used outside of its intent could be clearly called
> usage. URIs with multiple intents would have to be spelled out using the
> same base URI identifier, redeclared for each intent.
Ok, so let's describe the intent of how a resource is to be used, let's call
that a "purpose" and sometimes different systems will need different forms
of a resource, let's call that a "nature". So if we label a resource, by
"nature" and "purpose", we will have a mechanism where a system can pick a
resource according to what it needs to do with it.
> Is that to far whacked out an idea? Perhaps my own intent is unclear...
I think it would work.