xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)

RE: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:22:10 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3549BAFD79A7D411A1CF00508B62B5BC0124BA04@exchange-us.scenicsoft.com>

> It seems that the basic problem is not what URIs point too, but that they
> are being overloaded (points to a web page, identifies a namespace, points
> to resource definition, etc, etc.)
> 
> Should URI's be extended to include intent?

Isn't this what xlink:role and xlink:arcrole are already providing? Hence 
RDDL 'nature' and 'purpose'.

Cheers,

L.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
  - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread