xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE:

Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE:

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:04:13 -0500
In-reply-to: <080b01c1a084$13bfd1f0$2cd0a340@paultx>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF628A@HQ5> <5.1.0.14.2.20020118160029.022ee0d0@pop.intergate.ca> <080b01c1a084$13bfd1f0$2cd0a340@paultx>

On Friday 18 January 2002 07:56 pm, Paul T wrote:
> Also, I think that  'RDDL' is not such a subtile thing
> as it may look, because the namespaces are
> in the very core of XML, so playing with these
> entities affects the entire building.

Namespaces, thankfully, aren't in XML 1.0. As this whole thread 
attests, they're a mess. I've thought that since day 1, and have seen 
absolutely no reason to change my opinion.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev]Negotiate Out The Noise)
  - From: Paul T <pault12@pacbell.net>

Prev by Date: The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev]Negotiate Out The Noise)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XML is easy, was: Re: SV: [xml-dev] XML=WAP? And DOA?
Previous by thread: The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev]Negotiate Out The Noise)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev]Negotiate Out The Noise)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread