xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] Ther

Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] Ther

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:30:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF630E@HQ5>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF630E@HQ5>

On Friday 25 January 2002 03:22 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> You go a bit further and require multiple semantics and that
> the instance should be able to tell the system which semantics
> it can be used with.

Some people would claim that this is what namespaces do.

I don't think the document is the place to specify the sets of 
applicable semantics.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Generality of HTTP
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread