xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary

Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:45:10 +1100
References: <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJCEBGHDAA.ldodds@ingenta.com> <m3it91m6ep.fsf@dmitri.coolheads.com>

Perhaps Steven could mention what the difference between an "architecture" and
an "architectural form" is. 

And Leigh's article could say:
   XHTML is an architecture
   XLink is an architecture
   RDDL is another architecture (using XHTML and XLink both in particular ways)

If that is so...

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary
  - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com>

References:
- Architectural Forms, A Summary
  - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary
  - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs
Next by Date: OT: Re: [xml-dev] OT: Arguments (was: a number of other threads)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS