[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Friday 15 February 2002 18:09, Paul Prescod wrote:
> Now you would argue that it is "incorrect" for a URI referencing the
> concept to return a GET-able representation. But that is PRECISELY what
> HTTP is for. It is nothing more than a protocol for GET-ing, PUT-ting
> and POST-ing representations of resources and DELETEing resources.
Which was the original point: HTTP is not 'the universal protocol for doing
stuff to URIs'. We need other protocols and mechanisms to do other things.
Like physically being within line of site of a physical object like the
Eiffel Tower.
ABS
--
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
|
