[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Was that a serious answer? The fact that millions of people communicate
using software that talks a proprietary protocol on the Internet somehow
translates to that being a killer web service platform?
I guess someone better call Steve Case and tell him he's sitting on an
untapped Web Services gold mine. ;)
--
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #34
I will not turn into a snake. It never helps.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@userland.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:08 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC
>
>
> >>If the Napster protocol is so fantastic why aren't we using
> it for Web
> Services?
>
> I'm going to assume this is a serious question.
>
> The only thing that's fantastic about the Napster protocol
> was the number of people who used software that communicated
> using that protocol.
>
> The reason we're not using it is that Napster went bye-bye.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
