Lists Home |
Date Index |
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:email@example.com]
> I think you misread my proposal. (maybe)
> I'm asking people who are not interested in conforming to Web
> architecture merely to change their end-point URIs from
> We could make it even easier. We could define a SOAP URI that implied
> the ":987" bit.
Your right. I did misread it. If it's as simple as recommending that
developers use a different port without throwing out all those HTTP-oriented
tools for doing it, then that's fine with me. However -- to be honest -- my
firewall administrator is going to ask me why I can't just use port 80. But
in terms of defining SOAP specs and best practices, and getting the vendors
thinking more about best practices, this is just fine with me.