[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
>
> If you ask whether HTTP is an implementation of RPC, a
> protocol built on RPC, no. I'm not talking about hypertext -
> I'm talking about the foundations on which the HTTP protocol
> is itself built. I find those foundations to look
> suspiciously related to RPC, however loud the denials of their
> fans.
Sensible engineers build RPC on top of asynchronous unreliable
protocols. So you start with with async/unordered base and layer
sync/ordered on top; ie RPC can be baked as a set of guarantees and
constraints about messages between processes. If similar guarantees
can be identified in HTTP then you've got a case.
Bill de hÓra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBPHz8cOaWiFwg2CH4EQLMCgCfUnBj055KSS8J85yOZhiSlLUHZTwAoPDN
i1mYU6CifK73W9THHK1dewaP
=QtDr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|