xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language

Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: 02 Mar 2002 14:09:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>
References: <ZVVPLGFDMHFD73KGC0A8QLMIMG3VB0JF.3c80fc7f@MChamp> <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>

On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 12:30, Thomas B. Passin wrote: 
> It would be interesting to learn what other kinds of non-xml SAX generators
> people have written.  Anyone care to say?

Regular Fragmentations[1] currently converts non-angle-bracket notation
inside of XML documents into SAX events, and I'm working on extending
that functionality beyond an XML context.

[1] - http://www.simonstl.com/projects/fragment/

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread