xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language

Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 11:06:47 -0800
In-reply-to: <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp>
References: <003401c1c20f$efb35590$0bf13044@tbp> <ZVVPLGFDMHFD73KGC0A8QLMIMG3VB0JF.3c80fc7f@MChamp>

Thomas B. Passin wrote:

> It would be interesting to learn what other kinds of non-xml SAX generators
> people have written.  Anyone care to say?

I've written an nroff up-converter that works by
passing SAX-like events to a tree builder.  It's
not SAX (it's in Tcl, not Java), but the moral
equivalent.

--Joe English

  jenglish@flightlab.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS