[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 5:04 PM -0500 3/3/02, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>I see what you mean, but I'd expect the canonicalization to have already
>performed that resolution, and halted if it encountered a fall back.
>The canonicalized document sent to me would have no risk of "backhoe
>errors" modifying the meaning of the document, much as canonicalization
>currently removes the risk of external entities suffering backhoe
>errors.
>
However, that's not an option in the current XInclude draft. It
specifically states in section 4.4 Fallback Behavior:
XInclude processors must perform fallback behavior in the event of a
resource error, as follows:
If you turn off fallbacks, then you're not doing XInclude processing
according to the latest CR. The fallback option is a critical
difference between XInclude and external entities.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
